Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync?
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=21AfdkGTwaaWfde0J0u0ggmbP6TOO3pNB8tX8uSOTZ2w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync? (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Checkpoint not retrying failed fsync?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > New patch attached. For Linux users (read: almost all users) this patch on its own is a bit like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Because retrying on failure is useless, among other problems, Craig and Andres are working on converting IO errors into PANICs and overhauling the request queue[1]. I was about to mark this patch "rejected" and forget about it, since Craig's patch makes it redundant. But then I noticed that Craig's patch doesn't actually remove the retry behaviour completely: it promotes only EIO and ENOSPC to PANIC. If you somehow manage to get any other errno from fsync(), the checkpoint will fail and you'll be exposed to this bug: PostgreSQL forgets that the segment was dirty, so the next checkpoint might fsync nothing at all and then bogusly report success. So, I think either Craig's patch should PANIC on *any* error from fsync(), or we should commit this patch too so that we remember which segments are dirty next time around. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMsr%2BYFPeKVaQ57PwHqmRNjPCPABsdbV%3DL85he2dVBcr6yS1mA%40mail.gmail.com -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: