Re: shared_buffers on Big RAM systems
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: shared_buffers on Big RAM systems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=1x+b1ac0Y1Ft7MbMW+0JQnX7RKWEo8eRJsfDbWvLwG0A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | shared_buffers on Big RAM systems (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: shared_buffers on Big RAM systems
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:17 AM Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/runtime-config-resource.html > > The docs say, "If you have a dedicated database server with 1GB or more of > RAM, a reasonable starting value for shared_buffers is 25%". > > But that's pretty archaic in 2018. What if the dedicated database server > has 128GB RAM? I agree, we might as well drop the words "with 1GB of more of RAM". That's the size of the very smallest cloud instances available these days, available for free or up to a few bucks a month, and for physical servers I wonder if you can still get DIMMs that small. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: