Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins.
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=1uuT8iJxMEsR=jL+3zEi87DB2v0+0H9o_rUXXCZPZT3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins.
Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins. |
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > So this patch has been in place for two weeks, the buildfarm has still > got the measles, and we're entering the January commitfest with a lot > of other work to get done. I realize that the two weeks were mostly > holiday time, but it's time to have some urgency about clearing the > buildfarm failures. > > As best I understand, the remaining failures simply arise from > an unstable regression test case and aren't teaching us anything > of value. I propose that for the moment, we simply remove the > failing query from join.sql. We can put it back when there's > reason to think it will pass everywhere. I spent a lot of time trying and failing to get the world's slowest 32 bit powerpc emulation to reproduce this. Bleugh. Before we rip that test out, would you mind checking if this passes repeatedly on gaur or pademelon? -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: