Re: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=1MOmg52-e_74wMZVfmNoUy-725shs7t7frdDsNXvfkiA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump ("Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Ideriha, Takeshi <ideriha.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > I did regression tests (make check-world) and > checked manually pg_dump --on-conflict-do-nothing works properly. > Also it seems to me the code has no problem. > This feature has advantage to some users with small code change. > > So I marked it as 'Ready for committer'. > I'd like to wait and see committers opinions. Yeah, it's not an earth-shattering feature, but it might occasionally be useful and isn't complicated. + Add ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING clause in the INSERT commands. I think this would be better as: Add <literal>ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING</literal> to <command>INSERT</command> commands. + printf(_(" --on-conflict-do-nothing dump data as INSERT commands with ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING \n")); That's slightly misleading... let's just use the same wording again, eg "add ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING to INSERT commands". {"no-unlogged-table-data", no_argument, &no_unlogged_table_data, 1}, + {"on-conflict-do-nothing", no_argument, &on_conflict_do_nothing, 1}, I was tempted to say that this should be in alphabetical order, but then I noticed that these are only *almost* in alphabetical order, not quite. Oh well. Here's the version I'd like to commit, if there are no objections. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: