Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=1B61wrvZ2OMCFtEKemjSbUA8bje0qAX5s82c6LOOuAkg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:12 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:25 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Here's a new version. I did some cosmetic clean-up, and I dropped the > > changes to pg_controldata output, replication epoch/xid processing > > code and various similar non-essential changes. For this patch I want > > just the new type + next xid generator + appropriate conversions. > > > > I propose that we get this committed early in the cycle. That'd > > maximise testing time in the tree, fix the bug identified by Amit, and > > leave plenty of time for later patches to use FullTransactionId in > > more places as appropriate. > > Then probably it's the good time to do so. Any opinions or more reviews here? > I'll move it to the next CF for now. If there are no objections, I'm planning to do a round of testing and commit this shortly. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: