Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11)
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=1+OWGUOMOaJU+HmTqPXk3NS8QT1SfhBHn4hFHt=0p7Mg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11) (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions(PostgreSQL 11)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:26 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 01/24/2018 04:30 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > I am sending updated version. > > > > Very much thanks for very precious review > > Thomas, > > I am unable to replicate the Linux failure seen in the cfbot on my > Fedora machine. Both when building with libxml2 and without, after > applying the latest patch the tests pass without error. Can you please > investigate what's going on here? Well this is strange... I can't reproduce the problem either with or without --with-libxml on a Debian box (was trying to get fairly close to the OS that Travis runs on). But I see the same failure when I apply the patch on my FreeBSD 12 laptop and test without --with-libxml. Note that when cfbot runs it, the patch is applied with FreeBSD patch, and then it's tested without --with-libxml on Ubuntu (Travis's default OS). [Side note: I should change it to build --with-libxml, but that's not the point.] So the common factor is a different patch implementation. I wonder if a hunk is being misinterpreted. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: