Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=0y+wuYwJvpBa5S-wsV9ukLfyxujshtUa2_Z6WzNivFMg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 11/29/17 14:17, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> On 11/28/2017 10:03 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Here is a new patch that addresses the previous review comments. >>> >>> If there are no new comments, I think this might be ready to go. >> >> Looks good to me. Marking ready for committer. > > committed postgres=# \df List of functionsSchema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types | Type --------+------+------------------+---------------------+------public | bar | integer | i integer | funcpublic| foo | | i integer | proc (2 rows) Should this now be called a "List of routines"? -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: