Re: BUG #13636: psql numericlocale adds comma where it ought not
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #13636: psql numericlocale adds comma where it ought not |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=0x_-CpXc2VctwvKBn2eJ-HK04eZWFG1tAwr7d7kxJAyw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #13636: psql numericlocale adds comma where it ought not (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #13636: psql numericlocale adds comma where it ought not
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Indeed. It looks like the author of format_numeric_locale() never >>> heard of e-format output. There's some other pretty crummy code in >>> there, but that's the core problem ... > >> Does this look reasonable? > > I thought it needed a rather more thoroughgoing revision: there is no need > for it to assume so much about what is in the column, and good reason for > it not to. (For instance, I note that psql will try to apply this code to > "money" columns, which may be a bad idea, but there can definitely be > stuff in there that doesn't look like a regular number.) It should muck > with digits immediately following the sign, and nothing else. There was > some other useless inefficiency too. I came up with the attached. > > I would have borrowed your regression test additions, except I'm afraid > they will fail if the prevailing locale isn't C. Oops, right. (I suppose there could be a schedule of optional extra tests that somehow run with C locale for psql, but perhaps not worth setting up just for this.) -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: