Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
| От | Thomas Munro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEepm=0VwBX84zaBj4Gvpx8xQfNO2en_MWa3g0PiGVAxe8VzQg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II (Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Setting with lower "shared_buffers" and "work_mem" as below, query getting crash but able to see explain plan. Thanks Prabhat. A small thinko in the batch reset code means that it sometimes thinks the shared skew hash table is present and tries to probe it after batch 1. I have a fix for that and I will post a new patch set just as soon as I have a good regression test figured out. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: