Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=0EvDYJFVYOSZuOBF52F3D2Df35Vij7ehm5nDpQ4ohSGQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On the overall patch set: > > - I am curious to know how this has been tested. How much of the new > code is covered by the tests in 0007-Partition-wise-join-tests.patch? > How much does coverage improve with > 0008-Extra-testcases-for-partition-wise-join-NOT-FOR-COMM.patch? What > code, if any, is not covered by either of those test suites? Could we > do meaningful testing of this with something like Andreas > Seltenreich's sqlsmith? FWIW I'm working on an answer to both of those question, but keep getting distracted by other things catching on fire... -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: