Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Copy-editing for contrib/pg_visibility documentation.
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Copy-editing for contrib/pg_visibility documentation. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=0=VFjCcRRSBf9BFyAhME0vJBJQgoc9EvhEYLBd84xCLA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Copy-editing for contrib/pg_visibility documentation. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Copy-editing for
contrib/pg_visibility documentation.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Copy-editing for contrib/pg_visibility documentation. >> >> Add omitted names for some function parameters. >> Fix some minor grammatical issues. > > Why do you keep insisting on changing case where I've written "which" > to instead say "that" in situations where AFAIK either is perfectly > correct? I find such changes at best neutral, and in some cases > worse. 'Which' looks OK to me too here, but I speak some kind of British English, and it looks like at least some writers of formal American English prefer 'that' here: * http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Whichvs.That.html?old=Whichvs.That01.html * https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/that-or-which -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: