Re: Avoiding Tablespace path collision for primary and standby
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Avoiding Tablespace path collision for primary and standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=08dBFcydNo2NOOEA6X_CuYSze28FZ=-9tBViPaXRvOJg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Avoiding Tablespace path collision for primary and standby (Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>) |
Ответы |
Re: Avoiding Tablespace path collision for primary and standby
Re: Avoiding Tablespace path collision for primary and standby |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io> wrote: > To generate uniqueness for the path between primary and standby need to use > something which is not represented within database. So will be random to > some degree. Like one can use PORT number of postmaster. As only need to > generate unique path while creating link during CREATE TABLESPACE. I also wondered about this when trying to figure out how to write a TAP test for recovery testing with tablespaces, for my undo proposal. I was starting to wonder about either allowing relative paths or supporting some kind of variable in the tablespace path that could then be set differently in each cluster's .conf. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: