Re: Regarding pg_multixact/members folder size cleanup in postgres 9.3.6.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Yogesh Sharma
Тема Re: Regarding pg_multixact/members folder size cleanup in postgres 9.3.6.
Дата
Msg-id CAEZUwCSMwvvb2tE+uTt8n0AKtv_DF93PC33d_q_QmZOv-EbW5g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Regarding pg_multixact/members folder size cleanup in postgres 9.3.6.  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Regarding pg_multixact/members folder size cleanup in postgres 9.3.6.  (Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
Dear David, 

Thanks for update. 
I have also checked in postgres 9.3.21 and 9.5.x version. But this is same as 9.3.6 postres version. 



Regards, 
Yogesh

On Wednesday, February 14, 2018, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95@gmail.com> wrote:
I am using postgres 9.3.6 version and i am using multiple INSERT/UPDATE SQL commands with explicit share lock. 
​[...]​
 
4. I Want older postgres behavior in newer versions. So how to set this behavior through postgres parameters?

​You need to upgrade to 9.3.21.  Also, given the issues surrounding early 9.3 releases, did this cluster/database begin its life at 9.3.6 or was there an upgrade path to get there?

I don't know whether this is configurable but I would suspect not - your likely issue is software bugs that have since been fixed in one or more of the 15 releases since 9.3.6

David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pierre Timmermans
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Split read/write queries between 2 servers (one master and oneslave with streaming replication)?
Следующее
От: Yogesh Sharma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Regarding pg_multixact/members folder size cleanup in postgres 9.3.6.