Re: [committers] pgsql: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [committers] pgsql: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEZATCXygvKXdPk8dNvvHuA8ZJ_q4ObkBb2etuOuUz4tPksQUQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [committers] pgsql: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [committers] pgsql: RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test
module
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 24 April 2015 at 04:31, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Christian, > > * Christian Ullrich (chris@chrullrich.net) wrote: >> * Stephen Frost wrote: >> >> >RLS fixes, new hooks, and new test module >> >> The buildfarm says that with -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, the RLS >> violations get blamed on the wrong tables. Mostly, they are catalogs >> (I have seen pg_opclass, pg_am, and pg_amproc), but some also come >> up with binary garbage instead, e.g. >> >> - http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=markhor&dt=2015-04-23%2000%3A00%3A12 >> - http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=friarbird&dt=2015-04-23%2004%3A20%3A00 >> - http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tick&dt=2015-04-22%2019%3A56%3A53 > > Yup, thanks, Robert pointed this out on another thread and I'm looking > into it. > Ah, yes it looks like a couple of places in get_row_security_policies() ought to be making a copy of the relation name when setting it on the WCO. Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: