Re: Proposed HTML Documentation Styles
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed HTML Documentation Styles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEZATCXJNswQky7LZNOtFPNndBn-2HtstQQz+gvKmcg_ubxHNA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed HTML Documentation Styles ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 03:03, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote: > On 10/11/18 3:01 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 06:49, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote: > >> For example, attached are screenshots taken from my Android tablet > > > > For the record, that was a Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.0, with a screen > > resolution of 2048x1536 and a device pixel ratio of 2.0, I think. So > > the logical resolution is 1024x768, and in portrait mode, the logical > > width is 768 pixels. > > Unfortunately HTML tables are not great in mobile web. With that said, > we pushed up a change that should keep them from exploding as much to > the right. We've also bumped up the font-size slightly from the current > site so they could be slightly easier to read. > > (Note: when testing in the browser, they appear to be illegible unless > you have super vision, but when on an actual device they are legible). > > There is only so much we can do now without redesigning how the tables > are assembled. > Indeed. It's probably unrealistic to try to support really small devices. I mentioned that particular one because there was a clear regression from the old style. I have re-tested it and now it's much better, so thanks for the fix. Arguably, the font scaling in the @media CSS is now a little too aggressive. IMO 60% rather than 50% is a little more readable for the 576-768px range, and 80% rather than 70% for the 769-992px range, but that's a very subjective matter. Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: