Re: RLS restrictive hook policies

On 3 August 2015 at 16:09, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Dean, all,
>
> * Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
>> Agreed.  I'm happy to commit that change and back-patch it to 9.5,
>> barring objections.  Given that the only way to have restrictive
>> policies currently is using hooks, I don't believe there's any
>> documentation update required either; of course, I'll update the comment
>> to reflect this discussion/decision and make any necessary changes to
>> test_rls_hooks.
>
> Patch attached to make this change, with appropriate comment updates and
> fixes to the test_rls_hooks modules.
>
> Comments?
>

Looks good to me.

Regards,
Dean