Re: Row security violation error is misleading
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Row security violation error is misleading |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEZATCV_tn6BKeNU7_6UB7bLpCYi8Cpg5KgTMxO5EpdaSoCMWQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Row security violation error is misleading (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Row security violation error is misleading
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8 April 2015 at 16:27, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > * Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com) wrote: >> I actually re-used the sql status code 42501 - >> ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE for a RLS check failure because of the >> parallel with permissions checks, but I quite like Craig's idea of >> inventing a new status code for this, so that it can be more easily >> distinguished from a lack of GRANTed privileges. > > As I mentioned to Kevin, I'm not sure that this is really a useful > distinction. I'm quite curious if other systems provide that > distinction between grant violations and policy violations. If they do > then that would certainly bolster the argument to provide the > distinction in PG. > OK, on further reflection I think that's probably right. ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE is certainly more appropriate than anything based on a WCO violation, because it reflects the fact that the current user isn't allowed to perform the insert/update, but another user might be allowed, so this is a privilege problem, not a data error. Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: