Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEZATCV9vzD8cSet8LSQCvJapu2deDO_6k-SSrEPbYJA2yaLXA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 at 02:09, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 11/23/18 12:14 PM, Surafel Temesgen wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:59 PM Tomas Vondra > > <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com <mailto:tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote: > > So, what about using FILTER here? We already use it for aggregates when > > filtering rows to process. > > > > i think its good idea and describe its purpose more. Attache is a > > patch that use FILTER instead > FWIW, I vote for just using WHERE here. Right now we have 2 syntaxes for filtering rows in queries, both of which use WHERE immediately before the condition: 1). SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE condition 2). SELECT agg_fn FILTER (WHERE condition) FROM ... I'm not a huge fan of (2), but that's the SQL standard, so we're stuck with it. There's a certain consistency in it's use of WHERE to introduce the condition, and preceding that with FILTER helps to distinguish it from any later WHERE clause. But what you'd be adding here would be a 3rd syntax 3). COPY ... FROM ... FILTER condition which IMO will just lead to confusion. Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: