Re: Numeric multiplication overflow errors
От | Dean Rasheed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Numeric multiplication overflow errors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEZATCUS5sJ7BAPLE6m=GaqisZoxY92+p2ZOjkrbJbtewzuwOw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Numeric multiplication overflow errors (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Numeric multiplication overflow errors
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 10:27, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll post an update in a while. Thanks for the review. > One other thing I'm wondering about is back-patching. I was originally thinking of these as back-patchable bug fixes, but changing the binary format of the aggregate serialization states feels dodgy for a back-patch. But then, these functions are only callable in an aggregate context, and work in pairs. It could be a problem if someone were using them to pass state between different servers, but I see no evidence of them being used in that way. For reference, this will affect the following: - int8_avg_serialize() - numeric_avg_serialize() - numeric_poly_serialize() - numeric_serialize() and the corresponding *_deserialize functions. Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: