Re: About page on .org site
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: About page on .org site |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEYLb_XUEYBLqNZLP5c_DhNiSM4Ei6mUHhivP91_rKsj-L1jMg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: About page on .org site (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Somebody really should take the time and rewrite that thing sentence by >> sentence... > > Dunno about sentences. IMO the fact that the page is a long, boring > block of text is bad in itself. I agree. The way that it lists limitations like "Maximum Columns per Table" so prominently is just weird, too. In general, the text is far too tick-box orientated. If that was how people evaluated database systems, then Firebird would probably be almost as popular as PostgreSQL. The actual tick-boxes are in some cases ones that no one cares about. We certainly shouldn't list rules, for example. And the fact that we list things like having a Python driver suggests that it would not be preposterous if we did not have one. The about page also mentions HP-UX in the second sentence. Some of the features listed there are pretty cool, but I didn't know that until I used them. The overall picture of how PostgreSQL is flexible, extensible, and powerful is much more important, and could be expressed more tersely. Can someone with some marketing skills rewrite it? -- Regards, Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: