Re: Deprecating RULES
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Deprecating RULES |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEYLb_Wx4vusAj1j-4cUgHBC-sSCCha8tA3Z3+-75EW1SBP39w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Deprecating RULES (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 October 2012 18:50, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > I don't know how many times I have to say this: people are not listening. > Tom has already given a case for it upthread: > > >>> Triggers necessarily operate on a row-at-a-time basis. In theory, >>> for at least some bulk operations, a rule could greatly outperform >>> a trigger. It's difficult to walk away from that - unless somebody >>> can prove that the advantage doesn't ever accrue in practice. Fair point. I'm just not sure that that is a good enough reason to not deprecate rules. I mean, if experienced hackers cannot figure out if that's actually a useful facet of rules, what hope is there for anyone else? -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: