Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)
| От | Peter Geoghegan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEYLb_Ws+cAixXv0GDgH=+rtjyzWqgp-g7nshy7V=3pG22NbpQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay +
commit_siblings (sort of)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 June 2012 19:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> You think it will confuse users less if we start telling them to use >> something that we have a very long history of telling them not to use? > > I don't buy this line of reasoning at all. If we're going to rename > the GUC, it should be for accuracy, not PR value. If we start > renaming something every time we improve it, we're going to go nuts. > We improved lots of things in 9.2; they didn't all get renamed. That is a false equivalence, and you know it. Who said anything about PR value? I'm concerned with not confusing users. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: