Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects?
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEYLb_WdFoJPEcxxD5kX0XdFQ7beQP=URQRf=32b1CF8MsBamA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Policy on pulling in code from other projects? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 July 2011 18:43, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > So I am looking intently on what it is going to take to get the URI patch > done for psql [1] and was digging around the web and have a URI parser > library. It is under the New BSD license and is strictly RFC RFC 3986 [2] > compliant . > > Now I have not dug into the code but the parser is used by other projects. > So question is: > > Assuming the code actually makes this patch easier, do we: > > A. Pull in the code into the main tree > B. Instead have it as a requirement via configure? > > 1. > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1302114698.23164.17.camel@jd-desktop > > 2. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986 Without commenting on the practicalities of what you'd like to do, including code from other projects in the tree is well precedented. Off the top of my head, I can tell you that pgcrypto uses code from various sources, while preserving the original copyright notices. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: