Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEYLb_VuaHP3hNMJkB6fERPwQSsfyeKQ3YO35id0kc3n1N==dg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3 March 2012 20:22, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > Add it all up, and instead of pre-reading 32 consecutive 8K blocks, it > pre-reads only about 1 or 2 consecutive ones on the final merge. Now > some of those could be salvaged by the kernel keeping track of > multiple interleaved read ahead opportunities, but in my hands vmstat > shows a lot of IO wait and shows reads that seem to be closer to > random IO than large read-ahead. If it used truly efficient read > ahead, CPU would probably be limiting. Can you suggest a benchmark that will usefully exercise this patch? -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: