Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEYLb_VW-Yjtwyy5+P2QN-V1FX0ar6Hkm296+Ae8zMrNk1csmQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9 May 2012 00:21, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Yes, there is some checking of flags before the potential ResetLatch() > call, which may be acted on. The code there is almost identical to > that of the extant bgwriter code. I was under the impression that this > did not amount to a race, though it's rather late now, and I'm feeling > under the weather, so I have not taken steps to verify that I have it > right. Arguably, you'd want somebody's SetLatch call to be ignored if Sent too early. That should be: Arguably, you'd want somebody's SetLatch call to be ignored under the circumstances that that could happen in both the bgwriter, and the WALWriter within my recent patch. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: