Re: Draft release notes complete

On 10 May 2012 13:45, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Right, but I think it would be good to identify them explicitly as reviewers
> if we're going to include the names.

+1. I think we should probably do more to credit reviewers. It's not
uncommon for a reviewer to end up becoming a co-author, particularly
if they're a committer, but it's a little misleading to add a reviewer
after the feature description without qualifying that they are the
reviewer.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services