Re: Simulating Clog Contention
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simulating Clog Contention |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEYLb_V0m4nqcN93WfDwwOEqPL0EAqZ4EUzjm=+-QCn+7w=XuQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Simulating Clog Contention (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 January 2012 14:36, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > No doubt this is handy for testing this particular area, but overall I feel > this is too much of a one-trick pony to include in pgbench. I don't think that being conservative in accepting pgbench options is the right way to go. It's already so easy for a non-expert to shoot themselves in the foot that we don't do ourselves any favours by carefully weighing the merits of an expert-orientated feature. Have you ever read the man page for rsync? It's massive, with a huge number of options, and rsync is supposed to be a tool that's widely used by sysadmins, not a specialist database benchmarking tool. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: