Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs)
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEYLb_UYo2cPrhumxq4J3Xf_32Jvetv7K+mF09L=iXtESTjU6A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to
weak-memory-ordering bugs)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 14 September 2011 21:29, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've been thinking about this too and actually went so far as to do >> some research and put together something that I hope covers most of >> the interesting cases. The attached patch is pretty much entirely >> untested, but reflects my present belief about how things ought to >> work. > > And, here's an updated version, with some of the more obviously broken > things fixed. As I've already pointed out, the comment "Won't work on Visual Studio 2003" is not accurate: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f20w0x5e(v=vs.71).aspx Besides, if it's not supported, why bother mentioning it? -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: