Re: Large C files
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Large C files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEYLb_UJkgzD6KHanspEeWmnSc_e-Kbj=sFtvQnXJdYdH-F+Bg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Large C files (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Large C files
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 September 2011 00:13, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > * Within TUs, we unshadow a previously shadowed variable, so we link > to a global variable rather than one local to the original/other new > file. Unlikely to be a problem. Here's what I get when I compile > xlog.c in the usual way with the addition of the -Wshadow flag: I hit send too soon. Of course, this isn't going to matter in the case I described because an extern declaration of int foo cannot appear in the same TU as a static declaration of int foo - it won't compile. I hastily gave that as an example of a general phenomenon that can occur when performing this splitting process. An actually valid example of same would be if someone refactored functions a bit as part of this process to make things more modular, and now referenced a global variable rather than a local one as part of that process. This is quite possible, because namespace pollution is a big problem with heavyweight C files - Just look at how much output that -Wshadow flag gives when used on xlog.c. -- Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: