Re: New regression test time
| От | Robins Tharakan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New regression test time |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEP4nAyHVOOx9JgmbSG50jgF=-Usd=HO8D9rVQJe-2YyBNCddA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: New regression test time (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 June 2013 02:33, Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:
I think it is better to submit for next commit fest which is at below link:
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But
>> we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to
>> split our tests either.
>I have done a POC. See:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1170
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=19
Hi,
- There is a certain value in having separate tests, just that for the big-tests to be any meaningful, if the buildfarm could run on a periodic (daily?) basis and send some kind of automated bug-reports. Without an automatic feedback, most may not inclined to run all tests before submitting a patch and there'd be a big pile up near a release.
- For now, the new tests that I submit for review (for next CF) would be for 'make check', until a 'make bigcheck' or whatever is up and running.
--
Robins Tharakan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: