Re: recoveryCheck/008_fsm_truncation is failing on dodo in v14- (due to slow fsync?)
От | Robins Tharakan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: recoveryCheck/008_fsm_truncation is failing on dodo in v14- (due to slow fsync?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEP4nAxUR5x=ANP1yzPEMBh+VdZ7=LGi5SeC6jp4eu=JmNgcug@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: recoveryCheck/008_fsm_truncation is failing on dodo in v14- (due to slow fsync?) (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: recoveryCheck/008_fsm_truncation is failing on dodo in v14- (due to slow fsync?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 at 22:30, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
Unfortunately, the buildfarm log doesn't contain regress_log_002_limits,
but I managed to reproduce the failure on that my device, when it's storage
as slow as:
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=./test count=1024 oflag=dsync bs=128k
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
134217728 bytes (134 MB, 128 MiB) copied, 33.9446 s, 4.0 MB/s
The past ~1 week, I tried to space out all other tasks on the machine, so as to ensure
that 1-min CPU is mostly <2 (and thus not many things hammering the disk) and with
that I see 0 failures these past few days. This isn't conclusive by any means, but it
does seem that reducing IO contention has helped remove the errors, like what
Alexander suspects / repros here.
Just a note, that I've reverted some of those recent changes now, and so if the theory
holds true, I wouldn't be surprised if some of these errors restarted on dodo.
-
robins
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: