Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
От | Junwang Zhao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEG8a3KnwqopxjHSm0rVy4jBKhOw7_25VWp0Gq6FDSdiqKOb=g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi John, On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:44 AM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 9:01 AM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > latency average = 147.782 ms > > select * from bench_cstring_hash_unaligned(100000); > > latency average = 101.179 ms > > select * from bench_cstring_hash_aligned(100000); > > latency average = 101.219 ms > > Thanks for testing again! This looks closer to my results. It doesn't > show improvement for the aligned case, but it's not worse, either. > > There is still some polishing to be done, mostly on comments/examples, > but I think it's mostly there. I'll return to it by next week. > > + * Portions Copyright (c) 2018-2023, PostgreSQL Global Development Group A kind reminder, it's already 2024 :) I'm also curious why the 2018, is there any convention for that? -- Regards Junwang Zhao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: