Re: make pg_ctl more friendly
От | Junwang Zhao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: make pg_ctl more friendly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEG8a3Jime71U52aBLL7cB9KxrHY5A1Wv-TMT-79c+PA+kBk4w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: make pg_ctl more friendly (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: make pg_ctl more friendly
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Nathan, On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 5:39 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > + POSTMASTER_RECOVERY_SHUTDOWN, > > Perhaps this should be POSTMASTER_SHUTDOWN_IN_RECOVERY to match the state > in the control file? Agreed > > + case POSTMASTER_RECOVERY_SHUTDOWN: > + print_msg(_("PITR shutdown\n")); > + print_msg(_("update configuration for startup again if needed\n")); > + break; > > I'm not sure I agree that this is a substantially friendlier message. From > a quick skim of the thread, it seems like you want to avoid sending a scary > error message if Postgres was intentionally shut down while in recovery. > If I got this particular message, I think I would be worried that something > went wrong during my point-in-time restore, and I'd be scrambling to figure > out what configuration this message wants me to update. > > If I'm correctly interpreting the intent here, it might be worth fleshing > out the messages a bit more. For example, instead of "PITR shutdown," > perhaps we could say "shut down while in recovery." Make sense. Fixed. See V4 > And maybe we should > point to the specific settings in the latter message. I've changed this latter message to: update recovery target settings for startup again if needed What do you think? > > -- > Nathan Bossart > Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com -- Regards Junwang Zhao
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: