Re: jsonpath: Inconsistency of timestamp_tz() Output
От | Junwang Zhao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jsonpath: Inconsistency of timestamp_tz() Output |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEG8a3+QHYaLk+g8_LDnpbPMEC-Ht7-mOV2OsvTqqCmbWWJhew@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: jsonpath: Inconsistency of timestamp_tz() Output ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: jsonpath: Inconsistency of timestamp_tz() Output
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:22 PM David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2024, at 10:07, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote: > > > So perhaps I had things reversed before. Maybe it’s actually doing the right then when it converts a timestamp to a timestamptz,but not when it the input contains an offset, as in your example. > > To clarify, there’s an inconsistency in the output of timestamp_tz() depending on whether the input has an offset or not.With offset: > > david=# select jsonb_path_query_tz('"2024-08-15 12:34:56-05"', '$.timestamp_tz()'); > jsonb_path_query_tz > ----------------------------- > "2024-08-15T12:34:56-05:00" > > And without: > > david=# select jsonb_path_query_tz('"2024-08-15 12:34:56"', '$.timestamp_tz()'); > jsonb_path_query_tz > ----------------------------- > "2024-08-15T16:34:56+00:00" > > I suspect the latter is correct, given that the timestamptz type appears to be an int64, presumably always in UTC. I don’tunderstand where the first example stores the offset. In JsonbValue.val.datatime, there is a tz field, I think that's where the offset stored, it is 18000 in the first example struct { Datum value; Oid typid; int32 typmod; int tz; /* Numeric time zone, in seconds, for * TimestampTz data type */ } datetime; > > Best, > > David > > > -- Regards Junwang Zhao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: