Re: [PATCH] polish the error message of creating proc
От | Junwang Zhao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] polish the error message of creating proc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEG8a3+DJZPv43wXjemFJ_=Z5CwXp7eseRFhYGmm1=bA=1jqpQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] polish the error message of creating proc (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> writes: > > I noticed that there are some translations under the backend/po directory, > > can we just change > > msgid "function \"%s\" already exists with same argument types" > > to > > msgid "%s \"%s\" already exists with same argument types" ? > > No. This doesn't satisfy our message translation guidelines [1]. > The fact that there are other messages that aren't up to project > standard isn't a license to create more. > > More generally: there are probably dozens, if not hundreds, of > messages in the backend that say "function" but nowadays might > also be talking about a procedure. I'm not sure there's value > in improving just one of them. > > I am pretty sure that we made an explicit decision some time back > that it is okay to say "function" when the object could also be > an aggregate or window function. So you could at least cut this > back to just handling "procedure" and "function". Or you could > change it to "routine" as Julien suggests, but I think a lot of > people will not think that's an improvement. Yeah, make sense, will leave it as is. > > regards, tom lane > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/nls-programmer.html#NLS-GUIDELINES -- Regards Junwang Zhao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: