Re: BUG #12379: pgbench should hint to pgbench -i
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #12379: pgbench should hint to pgbench -i |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAECtzeWOm0JmJpDwM=woq8mfqfjPHOxLvSAaPrs=qOHvbWzxkw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #12379: pgbench should hint to pgbench -i (Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #12379: pgbench should hint to pgbench -i
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Le 4 juil. 2015 10:22 PM, "Julien Rouhaud" <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> a =C3=A9crit : > > On 22/05/2015 11:33, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > > >>> HINT: is "foo" the right database? did you initialize first (pgbench > >>> -i)? > >> > >> I don't think there is precedent for spitting out "HINT:" in client code > >> (at least grep didn't find it). So this message might look like it's > >> coming from the server, while it doesn't. > > > > Here is a v3, which makes it clearer that the hint comes from pgbench. > > > > HINT pgbench: is "foo" the right database? did you initialize first (-i)? > > > > Hello, > > I've just reviewed this patch. First, I've attached a rebased version > (v4), as the v3 doesn't apply anymore. > > The patch is pretty simple, so everything is ok. > > > But I've noticed that if you don't specify any database to pgbench, you > get an empty database information: > > HINT pgbench: is "" the right database? did you initialize > first (-i)? > > > This isn't related to this patch specifically, but it may be confusing > for users. At least more than the other places it could already appear > (debug mode and failed connection attempt). > > As the database name is optional, wouldn't it be better to fix this > behavior? > I can't look at the code right now, but doesn't it use PQdb() to get the name of the database? If it doesn't, it probably should. --=20 Guillaume
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: