Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAECtzeVVTEQ2L12uMZQzoMc7mwTagWcKPqfw9QUGY5Y-kbP__Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout (Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le jeu. 30 déc. 2021 à 11:44, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> a écrit :
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 17:18, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been reading the autovacuum code (the launcher and the worker) on the
> 14 branch. As previously, I've seen some configuration at the beginning,
> especially for statement_timeout, lock_timeout and
> idle_in_transaction_session_timeout, and I was surprised to discover there
> was no configuration for idle_session_timeout. I'm not sure the code should
> set it to 0 as well (otherwise I'd have written a patch), but, if there was
> a decision made to ignore its value, I'd be interested to know the reason.
> I could guess for the autovacuum worker (it seems to work in a transaction,
> so it's already handled by the idle_in_transaction_timeout), but I have no
> idea for the autovacuum launcher.
>
> If it was just missed, I could write a patch this week to fix this.
>
Oh, it was just missed. I didn't note set autovacuum code set those settings,
I think we should also set idle_session_timeout to 0.
Should we also change this for pg_dump and pg_backup_archiver?
pg_dump works in a single transaction, so it's already dealt with idle_in_transaction_timeout. Though I guess setting both would work too.
--
Guillaume.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: