Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables
От | Ashutosh Sharma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAE9k0PnSzdDN1uGxnpu-99xb6BjCDRCPszmM68n5S=L01ABFXg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Fabien, Amit, I could see that when an invalid number of partitions is specified, sometimes pgbench fails with an error "invalid number of partitions: ..." whereas many a times it doesn't, instead it creates number of partitions that hasn't been specified by the user. As partitions is an integer type variable, the maximum value it can hold is "2147483647". But if I specify partitions as "3147483647", atoi function returns a value lesser than zero and pgbench terminates with an error. However, if the value for number of partitions specified is something like "5147483647", atoi returns a non-negative number and pgbench creates as many number of partitions as the value returned by atoi function. Have a look at the below examples, [ashu@localhost bin]$ ./pgbench -i -s 10 --partitions=2147483647 postgres dropping old tables... creating tables... creating 2147483647 partitions... ^C [ashu@localhost bin]$ ./pgbench -i -s 10 --partitions=3147483647 postgres invalid number of partitions: "3147483647" [ashu@localhost bin]$ ./pgbench -i -s 10 --partitions=5147483647 postgres dropping old tables... creating tables... creating 852516351 partitions... ^C This seems like a problem with atoi function, isn't it? atoi functions has been used at several places in pgbench script and I can see similar behaviour for all. For e.g. it has been used with scale factor and above observation is true for that as well. So, is this a bug or you guys feel that it isn't and can be ignored? Please let me know your thoughts on this. Thank you. -- With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma EnterpriseDB:http://www.enterprisedb.com On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:30 AM Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > > > >> Thanks, attached is a patch with minor modifications which I am > >> planning to push after one more round of review on Thursday morning > >> IST unless there are more comments by anyone else. > > > > Pushed. > > Thanks! > > -- > Fabien. > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: