Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
От | Ashutosh Sharma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAE9k0Pmg5XLOfEYHLPkisyo353K01uchjTybLECKJPwaY3SgqQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Alexander Korotkov >> <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> >> > wrote: >> >> Alexander Korotkov wrote: >> >> >> >> > Difference between master, pgxact-align-2 and pgxact-align-3 doesn't >> >> > exceed >> >> > per run variation. >> >> >> >> FWIW this would be more visible if you added error bars to each data >> >> point. Should be simple enough in gnuplot ... >> > >> > Good point. >> > Please find graph of mean and errors in attachment. >> >> So ... no difference? > > > Yeah, nothing surprising. It's just another graph based on the same data. > I wonder how pgxact-align-3 would work on machine of Ashutosh Sharma, > because I observed regression there in write-heavy benchmark of > pgxact-align-2. I am yet to benchmark pgxact-align-3 patch on a read-write workload. I could not do it as our benchmarking machine was already reserved for some other test work. But, I am planning to do it on this weekend. Will try to post my results by Monday evening. Thank you and sorry for the delayed response.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: