Re: Truncation of mapped catalogs (whether local or shared) leads to server crash
От | Ashutosh Sharma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Truncation of mapped catalogs (whether local or shared) leads to server crash |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAE9k0PmcmN=hJJ+W5G53+JZPgYWrWQYMa=uynY_P3ZeNQzq4bA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Truncation of mapped catalogs (whether local or shared) leads to server crash (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Truncation of mapped catalogs (whether local or shared) leads to server crash
Re: Truncation of mapped catalogs (whether local or shared) leads to server crash |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 7:50 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:10 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Executing below commands: > >> -- set allow_system_table_mods TO on; > >> -- truncate table pg_type; > > > If the operation isn't allowed without turning on > > allow_system_table_mods, that means that doing it is probably a bad > > idea and will probably break stuff, as happened here. > > Nothing good can come of truncating *any* core system catalog --- what > do you think you'll still be able to do afterwards? > > I think the assertion you noticed is there because the code path gets > traversed during REINDEX, which is an operation we do support on > system catalogs. I have zero interest in making truncate work > on them. > I agree with you on that point. How about considering a complete restriction instead? -- With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: