Re: missing optimization - column <> column
От | Pantelis Theodosiou |
---|---|
Тема | Re: missing optimization - column <> column |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAE3TBxyjpAXLpgLkZTVFt+95J7_e4TjXEKRYfXv1o-8daW+3uQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: missing optimization - column <> column (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: missing optimization - column <> column
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Would it be worth replacing the condition with the equivalent?
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> I found some crazy queries in one customer application. These queries are
> stupid, but it was surprise for me so there are not some simple optimization
> create table foo(a int);
> insert into foo select generate_series(1,100000);
> analyze foo;
> explain select * from foo where a <> a;
> It does full scan of foo, although it should be replaced by false in
> planner time.
> Same issue is a expression a = a .. can be replaced by true
Wrong; those expressions yield NULL for NULL input. You could perhaps
optimize them slightly into some form of is-null test, but it hardly
seems worth the planner cycles to check for.
If you write something like "1 <> 1", it will be folded.
regards, tom lane
Would it be worth replacing the condition with the equivalent?
I mean would that help optimizing better some queries when it knows that a is (not) nullable or when "a" is more complicated expression?
a <> a : (a IS NULL) AND NULL
a = a : (a IS NOT NULL) OR NULL
Pantelis Theodosiou
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: