Re: Bug in amcheck?
| От | Mihail Nikalayeu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug in amcheck? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADzfLwW9-SH8zJrZ47QQkOspzm1R5kK7WgM_=oUyFOz=yfkagw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug in amcheck? (Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug in amcheck?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello! > Originally I investigated the customer's problem with PG16. And have > reproduced it for pg16,. I checked that relevant amcheck code was not > changed since pg16, so I thought that the problem takes place for all > Postgres versions. But looks like it is not true. I think it is still broken, but with less probability. Have you tried injection points on v16? Such a test case will make things much more clear. Also, I added Alexander to CC (he is author of bt_child_highkey_check) - maybe the issue is easily understandable for him. Best regards, Mikhail.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: