Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
От | Kohei KaiGai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADyhKSXPP4-PNhK1VZa6zpvzxJuyqJJuzyJt6Yep_u3L2ttLNg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib (Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012/7/12 Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>: > (2012/07/12 6:04), Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On tor, 2012-06-14 at 21:29 +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote: >>> I'd like to propose pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL, as a contrib module >>> in core, again. >> >> Do you have any new proposals regarding naming, and how to deal with >> postgresql_fdw_validator, and dblink? > > Yes, I've proposed to rename existing postgresql_fdw_validator to > dblink_fdw_validator and move it into contrib/dblink so that pgsql_fdw > can use the name "postgresql_fdw" and "postgresql_fdw_validator". > Though this post has had no response... > It seems to me what postgresql_fdw_validator() is doing looks like a function to be named as "libpq_fdw_validator()". How about your opinion? It will help this namespace conflicts. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: