Re: ALTER command reworks
От | Kohei KaiGai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER command reworks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADyhKSXOCAAKireD8b53Rum-_7bcnQtED+uiK8rsQHzpjPR9Zw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER command reworks (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012/10/2 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>: > Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie sep 28 18:17:32 -0300 2012: >> Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of lun sep 10 08:08:32 -0300 2012: >> >> > As attached, I split off the original one into three portions; for set-schema, >> > set-owner and rename-to. Please apply them in order of patch filename. >> >> Hmm, in the first patch, it seems to me we can simplify >> AlterObjectNamespace's signature: instead of passing all the details of >> the object class (cache Ids and attribute numbers and so on), just do >> >> AlterObjectNamespace(catalog-containing-object, objectId, newNamespaceOid) > > Like in the attached reworked version, in which I renamed the function > to AlterObjectNamespace_internal because the other name seemed a bit > wrong in the fact of the existing AlterObjectNamespace_oid. > > I also made the ALTER FUNCTION case go through > AlterObjectNamespace_internal; it seems pointless to have a separate > code path to go through when the generic one does just fine (also, this > makes functions identical to collations in implementation). That's one > less hook point for sepgsql, I guess. > Thanks for your reviewing, and sorry for my late response. I definitely agree with your solution. The reason why my original patch had separate code path for function and collation was they took additional elements (such as argument-list of function) to check duplicate names. So, I think it is a wise idea to invoke the common code after name duplication checks. Best regards, -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: