Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore
От | Kohei KaiGai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADyhKSX-xru4XRM-iSfive2P8Bs0fMbgThO5OeZHkzrkjg6dtg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore (Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2015-07-15 2:39 GMT+09:00 Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com>: > That's exactly what I'm talking about like I said KaiGais branch was > never merged into the mainline so I do not believe that it is used at > all. > It depends on the definition of "integrated". The PostgreSQL core offers an infrastructure for label based security mechanism, not only selinux. Also, one extension module that is usually distributed with PosgreSQL bridges the world of database and the world of selinux (even though all the features I initially designed are not yet implemented). I like to say it is integrated. > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'm sort of new to this so maybe I'm missing something but since the >>> sepgsql SELinux userspace object manager was never integrated into >>> postgresql (AFAIK KaiGais branch was never merged into the mainline) >>> who uses these labels? What use are they? >> >> See contrib/sepgsql >> >> -- >> Robert Haas >> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: