Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
От | Kohei KaiGai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] Common object property boards |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADyhKSWgDdBLnoQaZ47O=2Ynm_z04TvffpkDzsV_Nv3AX5Q15g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [RFC] Common object property boards (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2011/8/7 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes: >> I'm under implementation of this code according to the suggestion. >> However, I'm not sure whether it is really portable way (at least, GCC accepts), >> and whether the interface is simpler than as Robert suggested at first. > >> #define get_object_property_attnum_name(objtype) \ >> ({ AttrNumber ____temp; \ >> get_object_property((objtype), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, \ >> &____temp, NULL, NULL); \ >> ____temp; }) > > Blocks within expressions are a gcc-ism and will fail on any other > compiler, so you can't do it that way. > Thanks for your suggestion. So, it seems to me the interface should return a pointer to the entry of array being specified, rather than above approach. E.g, the above macro could be probably rewritten as follows: #define get_object_property_attnum_name(objtype) \ (get_object_property(objtype)->attnum_name) -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: