Re: 64-bit API for large object
От | Kohei KaiGai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 64-bit API for large object |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADyhKSVs318QeXwyRQdJ7DgzgOzgTmYa89EaWh=B8nnNFhtebA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 64-bit API for large object (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 64-bit API for large object
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I think Tom's point is, there are tons of applications which define > their own "int64_t" (at least in 2005). > Also pg_config.h has: > > #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1 > > and this suggests that PostgreSQL adopts to platforms which does not > have stdint.h. If so, we need to take care of such platforms anyway. > OK, it makes me clear. It might be helpful a source code comment to remain why we used self defined datatype here. 2012/9/21 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: >> To pass 64-bit integer to PQfn, PQArgBlock is used like this: int *ptr >> is a pointer to 64-bit integer and actual data is placed somewhere >> else. > > Yeah, I think we have to do it like that. Changing the size of > PQArgBlock would be a libpq ABI break, which IMO is sufficiently painful > to kill this whole proposal. Much better a little localized ugliness > in fe-lobj.c. > Hmm, I see. Please deliver the 64bit integer argument as reference, and don't forget endian translations here. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: