Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
От | Kohei KaiGai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADyhKSVJPR7LSGQ3otQ5xkrSqmrrbF1=u=X7ViArB1hXRw7Dig@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012/1/21 Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: >>>>> I guess you concerned about that expected/select_views_1.out is >>>>> patched, not expected/select_views.out. >>>>> I'm not sure the reason why regression test script tries to make diff >>>>> between results/select_views and expected/select_views_1.out. >>>> >>>> select_views.out and select_views_1.out are alternate expected output >>>> files. The regression tests pass if the actual output matches either >>>> one. Thus, you have to patch both. >>>> >>> It was new for me. The attached patch updates both of the expected >>> files, however, I'm not certain whether select_view.out is suitable, or >>> not, because my results/select_view.out matched with expected/select_view_1.out. >> >> Committed. We'll see what the buildfarm thinks. > > This passes installcheck initially. Then upon second invocation of > installcheck, it fails. > > It creates the role "alice", and doesn't clean it up. On next > invocation alice already exists and cases a failure in test > select_views. > Thanks for your pointing out. The attached patch adds cleaning-up part of object being defined within this test; includes user "alice". Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: