Re: New hook after raw parsing, before analyze
От | Kohei KaiGai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New hook after raw parsing, before analyze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADyhKSU5CtqvaOgva8VB2hHNJBSVB4Nzb_thKJgSN4Q+RJ3gHg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | New hook after raw parsing, before analyze (David Beck <dbeck@starschema.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: New hook after raw parsing, before analyze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
See the discussion of Custom-Scan API. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1282 I believe my third patch is what you really want to do... > This rewritten query would be handled by the FDW table that I previously added to the catalog. > > The reason I want this new hook is that I don't want tableA and tableB to be in the catalog. > I'd like to see why you wants the pseudo table "fdw_tableA_tableB" to be in the catalog, instead of the "tableA" and "tableB". In addition, parser shall raise an error if referenced columns (as a part of "tableA" or "tableB") are not in-catalog because of name lookup error. Thanks, 2014-02-13 19:01 GMT+09:00 David Beck <dbeck@starschema.net>: > Hello Hackers, > > I work on a foreign data wrapper for a legacy system. I generally find the hook system very useful and flexible way toextend Postgres. > The post parse analyze hook almost fits what I need, but I have a few use cases where I would need to tap right into theparsed queries but before any catalog based validation is done. > Please find the attached trivial patch for this new hook. > > One of the use cases I have is this: > > I have table like data structures in the source system for the FDW I work on. > These tables are sometimes too big and the source system is able to filter and join them with limitations, thus it is notoptimal to transfer the data to Postgres. > At the same time I want the users to think in terms of the original tables. > > The idea is to rewrite the SQL queries like this: > > "SELECT * FROM tableA a, tableB b WHERE a.id=b.id AND a.col1=1234 AND b.col2=987" > > to: > > "SELECT * FROM fdw_tableA_tableB ab WHERE ab.col1=1234 AND ab.col2=987" > > > This rewritten query would be handled by the FDW table that I previously added to the catalog. > > The reason I want this new hook is that I don't want tableA and tableB to be in the catalog. > > Looking forward to hear your thoughts, opinions, comments. > > Best regards, David > > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: