Re: Bug tracker tool we need
| От | Brendan Jurd |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADxJZo2NCefSAadExQQ_n=jrN9UdMSKLzjeyfndnhA8KGO58Eg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug tracker tool we need (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18 April 2012 13:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > ... I think you'll find a lot of that data could be mined out of our > historical commit logs already. I know I make a practice of mentioning > "bug #NNNN" whenever there is a relevant bug number, and I think other > committers do too. It wouldn't be 100% coverage, but still, if we could > bootstrap the tracker with a few hundred old bugs, we might have > something that was immediately useful, instead of starting from scratch > and hoping it would eventually contain enough data to be useful. Just as a data point, git tells me that there are 387 commits where the commit log message matches '#\d+', and 336 where it matches 'bug #\d+'. Cheers, BJ
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: